3 ms·
I don't get why you're so attached to a PR you make to another library. So you're not contributing because you want to improve that other library, you're contri
by fiatjaf 9y ago
I don't get why you're so attached to a PR you make to another library. So you're not contributing because you want to improve that other library, you're contributing because you want to sue them after so theycan pay you for your share of the project since you've added 10 lines of code?
- nextlevelwizard 9y agoI guess it is a combination of factors. As stated else where it seems like author has copied/forked existing project. Then (if I understood the license correctly) you are required to open source your software if you were to use the library, or pay $5k. On top of that if you contribute to the project you sign away your copyright. If these things are correct it seems like a one hot mess of a project.