5 ms·
I get the idea of grabbing the things most important to you before you and leaving your stuff behind in favor of kids (I guess), but what I'm curious about is w
by odammit 9y ago
I get the idea of grabbing the things most important to you before you and leaving your stuff behind in favor of kids (I guess), but what I'm curious about is what caused them to cover the barracks in the first place.
I mean if you have got the time to cement over barracks for 1000 people surely you have time to pack up!
- mentos 9y agoMaybe they intentionally left a time capsule?
- odammit 9y agoIt's pretty interesting. I wonder if the wooden tablets have information on what the intention was.
- edmccard 9y ago>if you have got the time to cement over barracks for 1000 people surely you have time to pack up! FTA: "a concrete floor laid by the Romans about 30 years after the barracks was abandoned" So the people covering it up were probably not the same as the ones who left in the first place.
- odammit 9y agoI missed that I suppose. Even more interesting not to pick up a bunch of potentially valuable stuff. Certainly not in my d&d campaign.
- dogruck 9y agoI had the same thought. I've poured some slabs. We might've covered some smokes or trash, but we picked up every weapon and dry good. I suppose they were burrying the stuff like Hoffa's corpse.
- pjc50 9y agoI suspect the artefacts weren't in a brick-and-tile building but a wood-and-thatch outbuilding, which after 30 years of abandonment would have collapsed and rotted over the contents. It's now 3.5m below "ground" level.
- dzdt 9y agoAccording to the article, the concrete floor was laid about 30 years after the artifacts were abandoned. If I understand it right, the fort had been raised and leveled more than once in between, so there was a thick layer of soil and debris between the floor and the artifacts at the time the floor was laid. The unknown question is why such valuable items were left the first time the fort was abandoned.