4 ms·
Being a techie and the father of a daughter, I'm sympathetic to the cause. But stuff like It would be scheduled and located so that women with families could a
by glhaynes 16y ago
Being a techie and the father of a daughter, I'm sympathetic to the cause. But stuff like
It would be scheduled and located so that women with families could actively do it. No “3-months in Silicon Valley”.
always rubs me the wrong way, whether it "should" or not. I'm a man with a family — in a "coparenting relationship" (kids spend a week with me then a week with mom, repeat) — and am exactly as likely to be able to move to Silicon Valley for a few months as a woman in the same situation would be (i.e. it's impossible).
Not that our field doesn't need more diversity; Lord knows it does.
EDIT: I want to add that I'm not in any way disparaging this project and I wish it the very best. Just wanted to throw in another perspective. As a straight white male born in the USA I've done quite well in the birth lottery, through no special work or talent of my own. But I think it's important and valuable (for all participants) as we move to a relationship/parenting model of each-couple-works-it-out-for-themselves shared responsibility that we recognize the implications and adapt appropriately. Easier said than done.
- dieterrams 16y agoYeah, if that's an accommodation worth making for women with families, it surely is for men, too, given that they're increasingly sharing parenting responsibilities.
- mrtron 16y agoOf course - which is why I would see it makes sense for differentiating between people with children. It is somehow of more consequence that a mother misses 3 months of a child's life than a father?