4 ms·

Can they please also punish sites that cover whole page with that stupid cookie warning, thanks.

• jacquesm 9y ago
  The legally required one?
  • jiggunjer 9y ago
    ...that wouldn't even be necessary if they didn't try to mine the marrow out of you.
  • cassowary 9y ago
    Could they just get around the requirement by using the HTML5 storage stuff? It's such a silly legal requirement. There's significant privacy concerns. And they make me close this silly message that has nothing to do with privacy at all.