5 ms·

It sounds like old-school 1940s-era science. Seems like you might be taking it too seriously.

• tyingq 9y ago
  It's just one study, but seems to be in the same rough space, and fairly recent: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-2051749/Autism-Wider-eyes-broader-mouth-Scientists-identify-subtle-distinct-facial-characteristics-children-developmental-disorder.html http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-2051749/Autism-Wid...
  • DanBC 9y ago
    You can't trust anything the daily fucking mail says. For example, from the article you link to: > Some scientists however believe there has been an actual rise in autism cases due to environmental factors. The MMR vaccine has been cited as a possible cause however a link has yet to be confirmed. This is bollocks, and we knew it was bollocks before 2011 (when this article was published). The GMC hearing; the Lancet retractions, and Wakefield being struck off all happened in 2010.
    • tyingq 9y ago
      The article publisher wasn't the interesting part. Other publications reported on the study.
      • DanBC 9y ago
        Why not link to the study and avoid the reputational hit that you'll always get from the daily fucking mail?
        • tyingq 9y ago
          "reputational hit". Heh.
          • mavhc 9y ago
            Daily Mail was pro Hitler and pro killing babies because they were gay. They are really good at SEO though.