I can accept a person closely related to and caring for their land to have some notion of ownership, but a corporation who only uses land without consideration

I can accept a person closely related to and caring for their land to have some notion of ownership, but a corporation who only uses land without consideration for it or the local animals that depend upon it, and only cares for profit cannot "own" something that is essentially timeless and really belongs to noone but the universe. Its like ants squabbling over owning mount everest.