>we’ve set aside Toronto and several other large cities because they’re not included in most of the data sets we’ve used Not because the data isn't available,

>we’ve set aside Toronto and several other large cities because they’re not included in most of the data sets we’ve used Not because the data isn't available, which it is (in abundance), but because it's not available in the data sets the chose to use. Not to put on a tinfoil hat or anything, but I have a very strong suspicion that they chose the data they did, and specifically mention leaving Toronto out, because they know that if they did otherwise, the data would show that Toronto is probably, if not the best, one of the top 3 options, and that likely wouldn't go over well with their core readership...