Thank you very much. I saved your comment and going to refer to it from time to time. I always said that AMP is solving a real problem. I just not entirely hap

Thank you very much. I saved your comment and going to refer to it from time to time. I always said that AMP is solving a real problem. I just not entirely happy with how they went about solving it. My main criticism of AMP is that I see it as a missed opportunity to make the web(all of it) better. If for example instead of creating AMP Google used a well know , open source tool like Lighthouse to benchmark websites and only let sites with certain score into their carousel, I bet that most of news web site would get rid of all but most necessary JavaScript really fast. Instead they introduced a new format, so now publishers have to maintain 2 versions of the site. It also locks users into Google "platform", not an evil thing per say, but definitely a self serving aspect, for which they get criticized. It's a complex issue. To give credit where it's due, the fact that AMP and team were able to help people like you speaks volumes in their favor. I just wished that we could work towards fixing the original web, instead of trying to invent a new one.