3 ms·
It's cheap to buy a new one for the features. It'd definitely be cheaper to buy a washer with 2010s construction and 1950s feature set, but that's not what cons
by hexane360 9y ago
It's cheap to buy a new one for the features. It'd definitely be cheaper to buy a washer with 2010s construction and 1950s feature set, but that's not what consumers (or environmental regulators) want. Likewise, a modern washer with 1950s construction would be outrageously expensive, not to mention material and energy inefficient. (Keep in mind that the operating cost of an appliance is a significant fraction of its total cost)
I'd also like to see a good data set of real prices of appliances over time.
Edit: Here's some examples of 1950s appliances: http://www.thepeoplehistory.com/50selectrical.html http://www.thepeoplehistory.com/50selectrical.html
Washer + Dryer in 1953: $494.90
Average monthly wage in 1953: $ 3,139.44 [0]
Average monthly wage in 2013: $44,888.16
So a 1953 washer+dryer cost the same amount of labor as a $7076 washer+dryer today.
[0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Average_Indexed_Monthly_Earnings https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Average_Indexed_Monthly_Earnin...
- userbinator 9y agoI'm pretty sure those "average monthly wage"s are not exactly per-person. The average person in US certainly did not make >$500k/year in 2013.