5 ms·
Sorry, I know this is very minor and beside the point (ironic, given what you just said about relevance), but isn't that exactly what connotation means? >a :
by Cederfjard 9y ago
Sorry, I know this is very minor and beside the point (ironic, given what you just said about relevance), but isn't that exactly what connotation means?
>a : the suggesting of a meaning by a word apart from the thing it explicitly names or describes⁰
Or is this perhaps even more meta than that - the choice itself can convey something apart from the semantics of a word, and this isn't something that the word connotation covers?
My apologies for sidetracking, you just got me wondering. I'm neither a native speaker nor a linguist, so it's tricky for me to think about these things sometimes. I agree with what you're saying, by the way.
[0] https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/connotation https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/connotation
- patio11 9y agoThe word connotation is typically used to describe inferences that you'd make about a statement given the word used which are widely available to native speakers of that language. Thin, skinny, and gaunt all mean the same thing; only "gaunt" has the connotation that the person described necessarily has a problem. The other poster is describing something a bit more meta than what the word connotation typically covers. They are describing something akin to a shibboleth, a great linguistics word. One's use of a shibboleth is an (often very quiet) signal of membership in an in-group. (c.f. usage #2 here: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/shibboleth https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/shibboleth ) An example: if someone steals your credit card, and you call your bank to report that, you could describe your requested action as either "opening a dispute" or "filing a chargeback." These are functionally equivalent but saying "chargeback" suggests that you're likely rather sophisticated about the mechanics of credit cards relative to most well-educated people.
- lsc 9y agoIsn't this what semiotics[1] is all about? The difference between connotations and denotations? My parents were really into that sort of thing "Words have power" - So during my 'bratty teenager' phase, I standardized on the word with the most negative denotation that had the correct connotation in my speech. I still do it sometimes, as a joke, but it's... funny, because while I have the feeling that the connotation is somehow less important than the denotation, and when I do the above, I'm attempting to point that out, nobody else seems to see it that way. To 'hire someone profitably' is a dramatically different thing, in most minds, than to 'exploit someone', even though the two words have an identical denotation. I used to see my lack of understanding here as a sign of how most people cannot see past their own emotions; I now see my lack of understanding as a sign of how I am not in touch with emotions in a fully human sort of way. [1]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semiotics https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semiotics
- Retric 9y agoConnotations are not meaningless. It's a question of redundancy when encoding information and should be treated like a checksum.
- smallnamespace 9y agoWhat you say might be true, but it isn't covered by Google's denotational definitional of the word connotation: connotation - 'an idea or feeling that a word invokes in addition to its literal or primary meaning.' That seems to also cover whatever meta- preferences that a particular word choice may signal. Funnily enough, we're now in the realm of debating the connotation vs. denotation of the word 'connotation' itself.
- astral303 9y agoYes, your meta interpretation is what I was getting at.
- KGIII 9y agoAlso, will vs. shall. The defendant will comply by... vs. The defendant shall comply by... When in doubt, use the latter.