3 ms·
Maybe not, but we should never stop entertaining other possibile improvements. The fact that mailing in ballot can be intercepted or even discarded is a problem
by yeukhon 9y ago
Maybe not, but we should never stop entertaining other possibile improvements. The fact that mailing in ballot can be intercepted or even discarded is a problem. Sure sometimes the most primitive and simplest solution is often the best. Reasons we are having this conversation is because eletronic voting has flaws, and having a few people watching a locked box also has problem. The whole counting by hand also has problem. Is there an intersection we can meet between traditional method and technical method?
I am a novice on the whole voting system, but just off the top of head my proposal would seem to work in ideal situation. The fact we have a record of ubique vote electronically and on paper is cruical to the integrity of each vote. There must have been a few dozen studies already on this topic. I'd suprise if no one has a bullet proof system yet. It CAN'T be that hard. Just emulate cryptography here.
- umanwizard 9y ago> The fact that mailing in ballot can be intercepted or even discarded is a problem. You don't need to mail anything anywhere in a paper vote, count by hand system. > having a few people watching a locked box also has problem. The whole counting by hand also has problem. What problem do they have? > I'd suprise if no one has a bullet proof system yet. We do have one: no electronics, count by hand in public view.