3 ms·
Nation-states are not people. Nations have (temporary and shifting) alliances based on common shared interests -- not love. Japan is a great ally. I lived ther
by ci5er 9y ago
Nation-states are not people. Nations have (temporary and shifting) alliances based on common shared interests -- not love.
Japan is a great ally. I lived there for over a decade, and I can say that I love the Japanese people. But I will admit - and their people of the WWII generation would too (although - sadly they are (have been) passing too quickly), it took a solid kick in the teeth to get them to calm down and cooperate.
Sometimes, with intense nation-state disagreement, things are settled at the point of a gun. Where there is a winner and a loser.
I like diplomacy as much (or more) than the next guy ... but it is irresponsible for a nation to be unprepared for when that doesn't work.
N.B. Fighting back after Pearl Harbor is a different kettle of fish than exporting democracy by force. We have no business doing the latter. It's obscene.
EDIT: I didn't downvote you. I appreciated your take on the query posed.
- rbanffy 9y agoNations are not loyal but people can be. If you do soft diplomacy right, those people will see your country as a partner and will vote accordingly. I didn't say one shouldn't be prepared to fight, just that fighting is almost never the right way to start it. Being prepared to defend yourself and your allies requires a vastly different inventory than cannon diplomacy.