3 ms·
Another thing to bear in mind: this is self-reported data. Even if the population numbers were perfectly fair, there are known differences in the way men and wo
by googlethrow821 9y ago
Another thing to bear in mind: this is self-reported data. Even if the population numbers were perfectly fair, there are known differences in the way men and women report things in surveys (example[1]). Personally, I conjecture that this bias and biases in response rates that affect men and women differently account for some of the reported differences in salary.
I'm more concerned about stuff that wouldn't show up in this data. For example, assuming a woman who is equally qualified as a man, I expect that the woman would be at a lower level on average, because e.g. of studies like those cited in [2]. I suspect that Google is better about this than most places, but I have heard too many stories from my woman coworkers to believe that things are perfectly fair. But I suspect this article makes things out to be perhaps slightly worse than they are, at least on the compensation front.
[1]: https://www.pri.org/stories/2013-05-30/women-underestimate-sexual-partners-while-men-exaggerate-says-study https://www.pri.org/stories/2013-05-30/women-underestimate-s...
[2]: https://hbr.org/2013/08/why-do-so-many-incompetent-men https://hbr.org/2013/08/why-do-so-many-incompetent-men
- hashkb 9y agoYou over generalize you citation [1]. it's not reasonable to assume the way we report our sexual history is the same as the way we report anything else.
- googlethrow821 9y agoIt was merely one example of the phenomenon. I am not generalizing from it. Rather, the example I provided is a specialization of the general rule.