3 ms·
> Even if Google were perfectly fair internally, women coming in from academia are likely to have faced gender bias [1], meaning less impressive resumes and the
by guitarbill 9y ago
> Even if Google were perfectly fair internally, women coming in from academia are likely to have faced gender bias [1], meaning less impressive resumes and therefore lower starting positions.
To play devil's advocate, if the performance review process was good/perfect and skill = compensation, factors like "less impressive resumes" should even out pretty quickly, right?
- wpietri 9y agoI doubt it. I once had an employee who had accepted an entry-level engineering position when they really were qualified for two levels above that. I was explicitly told they couldn't skip levels, and that I could only put them up for promotion so often. But even at a place that didn't have slow-down-there bias built in to the promotion process, the way you prove you're qualified for the next level is by doing work that's above your current level. Nobody will give staff engineer work to somebody in an entry level position; there's too much jockeying for that work by people one level down. So there's a practical limit to the rate at which somebody can advance even with no bias.