3 ms·
Hah! Surely a memory-safe language cannot have security vulnerabilities. /s I find it telling that in this case it was NOT a C program being responsible for th
by aewnjfksd 9y ago
Hah! Surely a memory-safe language cannot have security vulnerabilities. /s
I find it telling that in this case it was NOT a C program being responsible for the hack, even though the affected machine was likely running many orders of magnitude more C than Java code.
I've always said it and I will repeat it here again; higher level languages fail in ways that are much more surprising, complicated and hidden than your typical "insecure" C program.