4 ms·
Yeah, they do those things. But they make up a minority of their magazine content. They still do a lot of 'hard news' stuff (along with the vast majority of th
by johneth 9y ago
Yeah, they do those things. But they make up a minority of their magazine content.
They still do a lot of 'hard news' stuff (along with the vast majority of their output which is straight 'normal news'). For example, just this week: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/resources/idt-sh/g4s_brook_house_immigration_removal_centre_undercover http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/resources/idt-sh/g4s_brook_house_i...
- hvvvggg 9y ago> But they make up a minority of their magazine content. No excuse. That crap is paid for with my taxes. They don't need to lower themselves to that standard. That shit permeates, you know? The news side will look like that eventually. I'd have thought taxes + license fee would be enough to avoid the race to the bottom, but here we are.