>all the humans in the world put together couldn't make a 747 with their bare hands. How does this make sense. How do 747s exist if they are not created by our

>all the humans in the world put together couldn't make a 747 with their bare hands. How does this make sense. How do 747s exist if they are not created by our hands? Maybe it's my mistake, I am not precluding hands from using tools, as long as the tools are eventually made by hands somewhere along the supply chain. Lets not complicate the matter with deliberate nitpicking. This is not faulty logic, the fault is with you. >More to the point: Who was Gates unfair to? His own workers? He paid them well, in fact above market rates. His customers? They wanted his products more than they wanted their own money. I'm talking about his own workers. Market rate in India is 5 cents an hour. Market rate is rarely fair. If you think market rate is fair then you are highly highly mistaken. >It sounds like you're just looking at his wealth and saying "that's unfair" without having any idea of what he actually did that's unfair. That's... rather weak. Sounds like you made a claim about something I'm doing when I already told you my reasoning. Sounds like you didn't read what I wrote. I'll repeat the logic. He is being unfair because his wealth is to obscenely high for one man to own. What does that mean? It means what he "did" is underpay people working for him. Do I really need to spell out the logic? I am describing a dead body and I am calling the man with a bloody knife standing next the dead body the murderer and you are asking me to point out what he actually "did"