4 ms·
Facebook started as a clean alternative to MySpace. Facebook has now become even more bloated and painful to use than MySpace was. One hypothesis for why Googl
by thomastjeffery 9y ago
Facebook started as a clean alternative to MySpace. Facebook has now become even more bloated and painful to use than MySpace was.
One hypothesis for why Google+ and others did not "catch on" is because Facebook has orders of magnitude more users, and therefore has reached a "critical mass", meaning no significant amount of users will ever use an alternative.
My hypothesis is that there simply hasn't been a significantly superior alternative yet.
New alternatives can also use Facebook as an advantage by creating a compatible API. Facebook, of course, will "fight back" by making itself incompatible, but the only way it can do that is by making its own platform less usable.
- WorldMaker 9y agoFacebook didn't start out as an alternative to MySpace, it began as an alternative to hand-curated year book websites (and hard-bound paper year books). That it was cleaner to MySpace at the time was an accident. My hypothesis is that you aren't going to make the next Facebook by trying to replace Facebook or make some idea of "the next Facebook". You are going to make the next Facebook by doing something new that isn't very Facebook-like at all.
- thomastjeffery 9y agoIt's true that Facebook didn't intend to be an alternative to MySpace, but myself and everyone I know who used MySpace certainly saw it that way.