5 ms·
The real problem with C++ is that there isn't a fucking split function in the standard library.
by d0m 16y ago
The real problem with C++ is that there isn't a fucking split function in the standard library.
- sadapsi 16y agoI fail to understand why you are downvoted! but no string.split ??? wtf
- dan00 16y agoI donate you one: #include <vector> #include <string> #include <iostream> typedef std::vector<std::string> Strings_t; Strings_t split(const std::string& string, char onChar) { Strings_t splitted; size_t lastSplit = 0; for (size_t i = 0; i < string.size(); ++i) { if (string[i] == onChar) { if (lastSplit != i) splitted.push_back(std::string(string, lastSplit, i - lastSplit)); lastSplit = i + 1; } } if (lastSplit != string.size()) splitted.push_back(std::string(string, lastSplit, string.size() - lastSplit)); return splitted; } int main() { Strings_t strs = split("$$qqqq$$$w$$$eee$$a$d$$$$$", '$'); for (Strings_t::const_iterator s = strs.begin(); s != strs.end(); ++s) std::cout << *s << "\n"; return 0; }
- d0m 16y agoI never said I didn't know where to get one, or to actually write it. In fact, you can do it way simply with getline(). It just always pissed me off when I hack a little something and there is no split.. I then need to either include boost which is huuuuge compared to my 200 lines file.. code it myself, get a snippet from internet. The point is: in C++, there are so much things.. It's like a fuckload of thousand of features to satisfy everyone. How the fuck can there be no split? Ruby, split, python, split, java, split, php, split, C# split, C++ -your-20-lines-function-which-only-support-splitting-on-a-char-but-not-on-a-string.
- dan00 16y agoWell, all these languages are very stringy because they are very weby.