3 ms·Might just be me, but I read this as ~2 kilometers, rather than the intended ~2,000 miles.by egeekuk 9y agoMight just be me, but I read this as ~2 kilometers, rather than the intended ~2,000 miles.grzm 9y agoFWIW, the referenced article describes it more conventionally: > The distance was 3,089 kilometers (approximately 1,915 miles)vvanders 9y agoHaha good catch fixed that, meant 2,000 miles.deleted 9y ago[deleted]