This comment seems unrelated to the parent comment, as the parent makes no mention to government interference nor to any imagined requirement for a business to

This comment seems unrelated to the parent comment, as the parent makes no mention to government interference nor to any imagined requirement for a business to serve others. I understood "free speech" in the parent comment to mean an unwillingness to censor for any reason except those related to legal matters. It is one thing to say "we won't accept any supremacist or terrorist organization" outright; it is another to say you'll take anyone and then actually subject them to an arbitrary and unpublished terms of service.