4 ms·

Here's the list: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/6399615/what-breaking-changes-are-introduced-in-c11 https://stackoverflow.com/questions/6399615/what-breaki

Here's the list: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/6399615/what-breaking-changes-are-introduced-in-c11 https://stackoverflow.com/questions/6399615/what-breaking-ch... Was it one of those? If not then the fault was with your code or the implementation, not the spec. The language itself is very good at maintaining backward compatibility.

ernst_klim 9y ago
>you won't encounter a list of breaking changes >list of breaking changes Yeap, some shit with smart pointers in glibmm, didn't investigated much. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1438766 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1438766
- EpicEng 9y ago
  >C++17 will remove support for old-style exception specifications Right, you've been told for some time that those were deprecated. At some point deprecated features go away.