>Lastly do you have any actual argument against the papers methodology? Or the phrenology paper you link for that matter. The latter paper's approach is harshl

>Lastly do you have any actual argument against the papers methodology? Or the phrenology paper you link for that matter. The latter paper's approach is harshly criticised here: http://callingbullshit.org/case_studies/case_study_criminal_machine_learning.html http://callingbullshit.org/case_studies/case_study_criminal_...