> Presumption of innocence doesn't mean what you think it means. Really? What I think it means is that he shouldn't be punished until it's actually been eatabl

> Presumption of innocence doesn't mean what you think it means. Really? What I think it means is that he shouldn't be punished until it's actually been eatablihed that he did something. It seems to me that the process here was different. So what does it actually mean? >Rape and sexual assault are the only times when consent is assumed and its lack must be proven. Which is eminently sensible, since it's almost never rape when two people have sex, whereas it's almost always assault when someone punches you on the nose.