3 ms·
Isn't the score a function of how many people thought it was a good or bad movie, rather than an average score like Amazon reviews? Which means you could make
by sliverstorm 9y ago
Isn't the score a function of how many people thought it was a good or bad movie, rather than an average score like Amazon reviews?
Which means you could make a "decent" movie with universal appeal (100% of reviewers give C+), that would score better than a "great" movie with really niche appeal (10% of reviewers give A+, 90% give D-)
Which makes it a good meta for "worth seeing, you'll almost certainly enjoy it", but not the best meta for "objectively the greatest crime noir ever filmed"
- humanrebar 9y agoIt's more like whether a film is worth seeing. Critics don't think talking animal movies are good. They think the kids and parents will enjoy the experience and not regret the tickets. So they all rate it "sure, see it" and it gets 95% on rottentomatoes.