4 ms·
I haven't see TDT yet, so I can't speak to the quality of the movie, however, liking something is not the same as thinking it is good. There are plenty of movi
by nxsynonym 9y ago
I haven't see TDT yet, so I can't speak to the quality of the movie, however, liking something is not the same as thinking it is good.
There are plenty of movies that I love watching, but in no way consider well made.
I look to RT to see what's a "must see" (high critic and audience scores) or "must avoid in theaters" (low critic and low audience). Anything in between I decide like a I usually would.
The bigger issue is that of course Hollywood hates RT. It's much easier to dismiss a review than it is to make a good movie. I've also found that reviews in general have gotten way more divided (everything seems to be great or awful, not much in the middle) which I believe can be attributed to fishing for clicks. It's all speculation, but I can see middle-of-the-road reviews getting glazed over while "you must see this movie!" or "this is trash!" reviews will get the most clicks/comments/shares.
- nextlevelwizard 9y ago>There are plenty of movies that I love watching, but in no way consider well made This is my problem with every review(er). They keep talking about using too many same kind of shots or how something was lit and other stuff that has in my opinion nothing to do with the actual movie. There really should be two scores, technical score and story score. I don't care about technical aspects (almost) at all. I just care if the movie is entertaining or not. (Even the word 'entertaining' is bad to use, since some reviewers like to use it as insult i.e. 'movie was so bad it was entertaining to laugh at it')