3 ms·
This view always seems to get crucified in these discussions. While it is certainly true that a NAT is neither necessary nor sufficient for the kind of protecti
by mnarayan01 9y ago
This view always seems to get crucified in these discussions. While it is certainly true that a NAT is neither necessary nor sufficient for the kind of protection provided by a properly configured firewall, it's way better than the realistic alternative in 90+% of the cases: "Literally nothing". Just think how many actual businesses got nailed by e.g. Mongo's former default of listening on all interfaces.
- slrz 9y agoMost IPv6-capable home gateway boxen seem to do the right thing automatically here.