"There are probably people that are needy and can't afford the increased prices." I would imagine most people fall into this category during a crisis. Access

"There are probably people that are needy and can't afford the increased prices." I would imagine most people fall into this category during a crisis. Access is "drowned out" for everyone ... equally. The alternative is that only the rich have access. Which is better? In both scenerios people die, except in one onnly one class of people die. My point is there should be no "economic" model for private business in a natural disaster where lives are on the line.