4 ms·
Not really — wireless audio quality is significantly worse and less stable and wireless electronics are significantly more expensive. It's a feature in search
by zeveb 9y ago
Not really — wireless audio quality is significantly worse and less stable and wireless electronics are significantly more expensive. It's a feature in search of a purpose.
- dawnerd 9y agoMy air pods/air buds/ whatever Apple calls them, they cut out a lot. Sometimes only one at a time, sometimes both. Sometimes they don't connect to the phone at all despite being fully charged. My older plug in headphones with the adapter? Works every time.
- dkonofalski 9y agoThat's funny because my AirPods work great for me and I barely notice them most of the time yet I have piles of old headphones and earbuds that have crimped cables or knots and they cut out all the time. I even have two sets of great headphones (cans) and one of them needs a little bit of wiggling to get it to play 100%. Seems like a trade-off in either case and I'm willing to try the wireless thing until it becomes a pain. So far, it's been a pleasure.
- abritinthebay 9y agoYou have a point on the expensive but the rest is factually not true. Modern BT codecs are CD quality and modern BT chipsets will cut out less than the movement of a headphone cable in your pocket will.