3 ms·
I guess you could also use https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sound_from_ultrasound https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sound_from_ultrasound, which would mean unless you'
by anfractuosity 9y ago
I guess you could also use https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sound_from_ultrasound https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sound_from_ultrasound, which would mean unless you're in it's line of sight you shouldn't hear it.
I'm specifically thinking of the parametric array type.
I'd love to see how directional that is sometime, as there are cheapish implementations of hardware for it.
Edit: Originally I thought a human might be able to hear their sound, but reading a bit more I don't think that's the case since it's exploiting non-linearity of the microphone
Also it seems ultrasound can be used to affect other MEMS devices:
https://arstechnica.co.uk/gadgets/2017/07/sounds-bad-researchers-demonstrate-sonic-gun-threat-against-smart-devices/ https://arstechnica.co.uk/gadgets/2017/07/sounds-bad-researc...
I wonder if there's any acoustic metamaterial that you could place over the mic etc. to filter ultrasound out before it reaches it.
- Animats 9y agoThose sound-from-ultrasound systems have been around for a while. The principle is similar - both exploit nonlinearities in the receiving medium. The sound-from-ultrasound people seem to have finally brought up the audio quality to an acceptable level for music. The nonlinear process by which two ultrasonic signals combine in air to produce an audible signal introduces distortion. So the signal-generating software has to compensate somehow. (Why is backspace so slow in this text box? Firefox 54, Ubuntu 16.04.)