4 ms·
I'm curious what the ecosystem for Python looked like in ~1999. Did it show signs of having the ecosystem it has now in those years? I'm certain that almost ev
by dom96 9y ago
I'm curious what the ecosystem for Python looked like in ~1999. Did it show signs of having the ecosystem it has now in those years?
I'm certain that almost everyone dismissed it due to its syntax (there are still people out there that dismiss it because of that).
- nimmer 9y ago> what the ecosystem for Python looked like in ~1999 Very small. The language was not popular and many people claimed a community project could not overtake languages backed by companies. Same for the Linux kernel.
- dom96 9y agoThank you for supporting my point. However, based on your nickname I wouldn't be surprised if you were a little biased :) I would actually love to read some forum/mailing list posts about this. If anyone has any links handy (or knows where to find them) then please post them.
- coldtea 9y agoI actually used Python commercially in 1999. The "killer app" then was an app server + document store called Zope. Things were smaller than today, but Python was already gaining popularity for scripting. Circa 2001 or so it also had good Gtk and Qt bindings -- there were even some KDE-inspired satellite commercial companies catering to Python/QT. The discussions in Python land then were about the mythical Python 3000 -- the next, re-imagined version of Python that would fix issues, etc. That was eventually Python 3. Perl was still king for scripting/admin stuff but losing momentum, and Ruby was mentioned as a nice alternative to Python, but with much smaller use at the time (and even today I think).