3 ms·
> SEC ... doesn't set the price of each stock No it doesn't, but SEC has the power to allow the stock to get traded in the first place. So the value is subject
by ktta 9y ago
> SEC ... doesn't set the price of each stock
No it doesn't, but SEC has the power to allow the stock to get traded in the first place. So the value is subject to SEC's presence. If there is no SEC, there is no 'stock' for you to get dividends from.
> BMW costs more than honda because it is objectively a better car. By objectively identifiable metrics.
You discount the people do don't give care about the objective metrics. There's a lot of personal preference involved when one chooses a car to buy (apart from buying power).
>But in the US people are moving from cold climates to warmer climates, on average
Last time I checked, US has of 4% of the world's population. I'd wager more than 4% of the world would love to move to a colder climate.
>So, no, you are completely wrong.
I don't think any of the facts I've stated are. If you're talking about my opinion that there is only subjective value, well, that's subjective too :)
- vasilipupkin 9y agoNot correct. The price of the stock times shares outstanding is its value. Where does this value come from? Why are Apple and google doing so well? It's not, by your logic, because they are great companies - that would be an objective metric, no? Existence of the SEC doesn't make stock values subjective. Any argument here that starts with "some people" - is irrelevant. Everything we are discussing is about on average, statistically. On average, a beachfront condo in Miami will cost more than an equivalent condo in Iowa. Why? Because it's on the beach and people, on average, value that more than being somewhere in Iowa