3 ms·
Those people were advocating for stability, not necessarily for P2. The 2->3 was a pretty big screw up, and it definitely had an impact on the language and ecos
by blub 9y ago
Those people were advocating for stability, not necessarily for P2. The 2->3 was a pretty big screw up, and it definitely had an impact on the language and ecosystem.
Python seems to have overcome that (keyword: seems), thanks to a strong offering in data science, but 2->3 is still a headache. I never really used Python for application development, but rather for utility/scripts and I am still on 2, because I don't need more.
2 is available out of the box on all OSes and at work we also use 2 for building tools.
I have the feeling that Python is still losing people to Golang due to its weak performance and Golang's reputation in that area.
So instead of being arrogant about 2->3, I'd say Python devs should be thankful to data science for saving their butts. :)
- fleurdelotus 9y ago>>Python is still losing people to Golang Any source (other than Rob Pike) ?
- blub 9y agoAnecdata I'm afraid, hence "feeling". This can only be solved through an actual market study. The SO post is not the study we need, because it uses a proxy variable (SO tags).
- goatlover 9y agoI doubt Python is losing people to Golang in scientific computing.