You seem to be arguing with a point I'm not trying to make. But if you are suggesting that the decision should be fact based and present an argument with suppo

You seem to be arguing with a point I'm not trying to make. But if you are suggesting that the decision should be fact based and present an argument with supporting statistics. Then those statistics should be relevant to your argument. The statistics presented in the article were not relevant. If it is not dangerous, it should be possible to show this with data... the data presented in the article is poor and doesn't support his case well.