4 ms·
not surprising imho - you probably have more 'dedicated hardware' (in an abstract sense) per request than a busy CDN.. if the site software is all cached in ram
by cat199 9y ago
not surprising imho - you probably have more 'dedicated hardware' (in an abstract sense) per request than a busy CDN.. if the site software is all cached in ram and cores are free, you're pretty much running 'wide open' on each request..
- DamonHD 9y agoAbsolutely. Though still, the CDN folks have faster machines not running in power-saving mode, and lower latency into the core UK Internet peering points / LINX, and my RPi is doing other things too, such as running a substantial Java-based server.