I'm not sure I'm a fan of all of the evaluation-criteria. Specifically the 1st one: "High Level: A good FPL should not have constructs that concern machine int

I'm not sure I'm a fan of all of the evaluation-criteria. Specifically the 1st one: "High Level: A good FPL should not have constructs that concern machine internals and possess no semantic value[18]" This is a subjective measure based on how much effort & time a new student's priorities allow them to put into learning. Obfuscating underlying mechanisms is only good when there isn't sufficient time to teach them. A high rating in this area implies a FPL-student's goal should be to make an application, & not necessarily understand how it works in the process. [18]--SIGCSE '95 Proceedings of the twenty-sixth SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education Pages 173-177