This sounds like it runs contrary to the commonly held belief that it would be much cheaper on a macro level for people to consume more expensive, less shitty (

This sounds like it runs contrary to the commonly held belief that it would be much cheaper on a macro level for people to consume more expensive, less shitty (i.e., all starch, salt, and sugar) food than for us to exist in our current global heart disease and diabetes epidemic. Preventative measures are supposed to be the way to go, from what I've heard. Spending money on telling people how to eat correctly obviously goes against corporate interest, so it doesn't usually happen.