3 ms·
That may be largely due to massive amount of work put into the old way. Even if GA is just fundamentally a better idea for doing graphics, it doesn't have decad
by letlambda 9y ago
That may be largely due to massive amount of work put into the old way. Even if GA is just fundamentally a better idea for doing graphics, it doesn't have decades of software and hardware development to back it up.
Imagine selling this:
I've got a new idea, with a mere re-education campaign for our developers, major graphics engine overhaul, and... convincing NVIDIA or AMD to implement some GA specific optimizations in hardware. We can have a much more mathematically satisfying code base!
- analognoise 9y agoThis sounds like a job for an FPGA-based graphics system as a prototype.