3 ms·

So someone went looking into the public voting record, presumably to find things they could exploit to get rid of him. How is this different to what the OP sai

• lern_too_spel 9y ago
  Once again, it's not his voting record. He donated to a campaign that vilified gays.[1] It was publicized years before he was offered the CEO role and had already made gay Mozilla employees uncomfortable[2], but it's obviously different working with somebody who vilifies you vs. working for somebody who does. The gay employees of Mozilla were understandably upset when he became CEO, and since the Bay Area in general is pretty progressive, many other employees were also upset. They were looking for new employers. I gave an anti-miscegenation analogy earlier. How is this different from a CEO making a public donation to The Daily Stormer (perhaps pointing to the stories of Judas and Cain as justification) and the Jewish and non-white employees and their allies not wanting to work for him? You cannot take public action to vilify your employees and deny them civil rights and expect them to keep working for you. [1] https://youtu.be/pSb3jiuIhUM https://youtu.be/pSb3jiuIhUM [2] http://observer.com/2012/04/tech-celeb-makes-prop-8-donation-internet-goes-berserk/ http://observer.com/2012/04/tech-celeb-makes-prop-8-donation...