4 ms·

i dont find java to be very friendly. i find boilerplate and attempts to protect me from myself to be the opposite of friendly. i also find jvm infrastructure

i dont find java to be very friendly. i find boilerplate and attempts to protect me from myself to be the opposite of friendly. i also find jvm infrastructure to be less easy to deal with than the infrastructure that many other languages have. i would replace 'friendliness of java' with 'breadth of support for'.

tomjen3 16y ago
Compared to many of the alternatives, Javas is very friendly. There aren't too many ways you can shoot yourself in the head, and it mostely does what you would expect it to do.
- spooneybarger 16y ago
  We have a difference of opinion on what is 'friendly'. I don't consider protecting me from shooting myself in the head to be 'friendly', I would call that 'paternalistic'. I would call allowing me to easily express what I want 'friendly'. I find lisps, smalltalk and their brethren to be friendly under my definition.
  - d0m 16y ago
    (As the author of the first comment), I said friendly in the sens beginner-friendly. Where they are a tons of documentation (online and books) available, tons of libraries, tons of person actually using it, lots of job opportunities, easy to learn, etc. I know some authors recommend learning lisp as a first language because there are not a lot of syntax and you can focus on the important problems. However, from my experience, my university colleague hated lisp and prolog, preferred C++ and really liked C# and Java. Lots of them were pretty beginners or bad programmers, but still, you can't start somewhere and be already an expert. So, hope it clarified what I mean by Java being friendly. And then, Clojure might be less friendly than java.. but still, in this mentality, might be more friendly than scheme .
amalcon 16y ago
It's friendly in more the social/cooperative sense than the sense that it's easy to work with in itself: there are a lot of very good libraries, the runtime is pretty much fully baked, and you get a wide choice of development tools.
- spooneybarger 16y ago
  So there is a breadth of support you don't get elsewhere? I wouldn't argue with that. When it comes to breadth of support, it is hard to argue against java, php etc.
TallGuyShort 16y ago
One of my favorite things about Clojure is how it does away with much of this boiler-plate. With macros and the general style of lisp, I turned a very boiler-platey java project into an extremely compact clojure project. I really enjoy how I can look at the clojure code and easily see the flow of what I'm actually trying to do.
apower 16y ago
Why don't you use C then? It would let you freely shoot yourself on the foot.
- spooneybarger 16y ago
  because i prefer the 'meta power' that smalltalk and lisp provide me. plus, i hate managing memory when i don't have to. if i still wrote stuff that had to snuggle up to the hardware, i would probably still be using c or c++ but, i'm not writing that type of code anymore so i don't have need to use c or c++.

tomjen3 16y ago

Compared to many of the alternatives, Javas is very friendly. There aren't too many ways you can shoot yourself in the head, and it mostely does what you would expect it to do.

spooneybarger 16y ago
We have a difference of opinion on what is 'friendly'. I don't consider protecting me from shooting myself in the head to be 'friendly', I would call that 'paternalistic'. I would call allowing me to easily express what I want 'friendly'. I find lisps, smalltalk and their brethren to be friendly under my definition.
- d0m 16y ago
  (As the author of the first comment), I said friendly in the sens beginner-friendly. Where they are a tons of documentation (online and books) available, tons of libraries, tons of person actually using it, lots of job opportunities, easy to learn, etc. I know some authors recommend learning lisp as a first language because there are not a lot of syntax and you can focus on the important problems. However, from my experience, my university colleague hated lisp and prolog, preferred C++ and really liked C# and Java. Lots of them were pretty beginners or bad programmers, but still, you can't start somewhere and be already an expert. So, hope it clarified what I mean by Java being friendly. And then, Clojure might be less friendly than java.. but still, in this mentality, might be more friendly than scheme .

amalcon 16y ago

It's friendly in more the social/cooperative sense than the sense that it's easy to work with in itself: there are a lot of very good libraries, the runtime is pretty much fully baked, and you get a wide choice of development tools.

spooneybarger 16y ago
So there is a breadth of support you don't get elsewhere? I wouldn't argue with that. When it comes to breadth of support, it is hard to argue against java, php etc.

TallGuyShort 16y ago

One of my favorite things about Clojure is how it does away with much of this boiler-plate. With macros and the general style of lisp, I turned a very boiler-platey java project into an extremely compact clojure project. I really enjoy how I can look at the clojure code and easily see the flow of what I'm actually trying to do.

apower 16y ago

Why don't you use C then? It would let you freely shoot yourself on the foot.

spooneybarger 16y ago
because i prefer the 'meta power' that smalltalk and lisp provide me. plus, i hate managing memory when i don't have to. if i still wrote stuff that had to snuggle up to the hardware, i would probably still be using c or c++ but, i'm not writing that type of code anymore so i don't have need to use c or c++.