3 ms·
> I think that any expectation of privacy when using work resources to communicate is unreasonable I assume this must be depend on the society, as I have a ver
by distances 9y ago
> I think that any expectation of privacy when using work resources to communicate is unreasonable
I assume this must be depend on the society, as I have a very strong expectation in the contrary. I already mentioned this in another thread; here the employer may never read e-mail contents, and reading metadata requires very specific legal steps to be taken.
- closeparen 9y agoSo your work email doesn't have a spam filter?
- thanksgiving 9y agoIt is like saying because Google mail goes through the text of the mail to guess whether a message is spam, it no longer matters that they don't use the contents of the message for targeted ads. This is clearly not true assuming Google keeps the spam training data and the ad serving days separate. Am I missing something?
- closeparen 9y agoThey aren't equivalent. But they are both examples of processing data about a person. The GDPR doesn't say anything about advertising vs. security and network management purposes.
- taejo 9y agoA spam filter is usually a computer program. As far as I know, they are never employers. If your company's "spam filter" tells your employer what your sexual orientation is, whether you or your wife are picking the kids up from school, or when you're looking for a new job, I suggest you stop calling it a "spam filter" and start looking for a better job.