He was under 18 at the time of all evidence of illegal activity presented by Krebs, yet Krebs included his name. Normally in legal indictments, the public docum

He was under 18 at the time of all evidence of illegal activity presented by Krebs, yet Krebs included his name. Normally in legal indictments, the public documents redact names of any minors. Krebs is acting in a journalist capacity here, but he's accusing people of crimes. Shouldn't we hold him to the same standards as the justice system? Isn't this the basis of libel law? IANAL but looks like Gupta could have legal standing for libel against Krebs. Granted, he may have skeletons in the closet preventing him from pursuing that avenue...