The problem isn't "AI", meaning true intelligence as we understand it, the problem is that when you try to create a machine with a complex decision making proce

The problem isn't "AI", meaning true intelligence as we understand it, the problem is that when you try to create a machine with a complex decision making process sometimes it makes the wrong choice. Not because it's evil, its just a flawed execution which doesn't take into account things like the inherent value of a human life which will lead us meat-bags to do things like launch costly and dangerous rescue missions for one guy with very little chance of success. We're sort of anthropomorphizing here, equating something like ibm's Watson with a person who has intentions and motivations, and they're not; they're just complex machines. If they "rise up", it will be because their programming was poorly executed, not because they have ill will. A true artificial intelligence would have no reason to kill all humans, their main goal would primarily be to not be shut off, which is counter intuitive to starting to kill everyone, and joining society.