Whether on the reporter or not, it would still be an nda violation, and that's a IMHO reasonable reason to pull a story. I'd also be wildly shocked if the pres

Whether on the reporter or not, it would still be an nda violation, and that's a IMHO reasonable reason to pull a story. I'd also be wildly shocked if the presentation/information given was not stamped "Google Confidential and Proprietary". I have never seen one that isn't in this situation. That is explicitly done to signal that it's a thing covered under an NDA. If your company signs NDA's, and isn't telling people who may receive the information that "getting stuff marked confidential means it's under that NDA", you are eventually in for a world of hurt and contractual damages.