4 ms·
Lots of cultures don't class fish in with most meats. In traditional Catholicism the rule against meat on Fridays didn't apply to fish and likewise with Japane
by Symmetry 9y ago
Lots of cultures don't class fish in with most meats. In traditional Catholicism the rule against meat on Fridays didn't apply to fish and likewise with Japanese Buddhist rules against meat eating. It's sort of like how most people consider tomatoes to be vegetables even though they aren't, scientifically.
Yeah, in 21st century English fish is a meat but it's non-centrally meat so the meaning is clear when you apply Gricean norms.
- Shikadi 9y agoWoah woah woah, hold up there. Scientifically speaking, a vegetable is the edible part of a plant. Tomatos are vegetables and fruits scientifically. This is like arguing that a square isn't a rectangle! Okay, carry on <3
- hnzix 9y ago> In traditional Catholicism the rule against meat on Fridays didn't apply to fish Beaver meat is also a-ok! https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/thoughtful-animal/once-upon-a-time-the-catholic-church-decided-that-beavers-were-fish/ https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/thoughtful-animal/once-...
- taneq 9y agoLikewise chicken is often not considered 'meat' despite clearly being the flesh of an animal. It's kind of weird, but not as weird as the people who think "a little bit of ham" in a salad doesn't count as meat.
- gizmo686 9y agoJudism also doesn't consider fish meat for the purposes of Kosher-ness.
- brepl 9y ago> Yeah, in 21st century English fish is a meat Having spent the best part of the last 17 years speaking 21st century English, this is a surprisingly strong assertion to me. From http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/115517 http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/115517: > The flesh of animals used as food, esp. excluding fish...
- pault 9y agoWhen I was visiting Brazil I met a bunch of people that called themselves vegetarians who would eat chicken and bacon. Turns out "vegetarian" means not eating beef. It led to some pretty funny misunderstandings.