Meillasoux's critique of correlationism is a critique of Kant/phenomenology, not postmodernism, at all. Viz., that truth is "correlational." Meillasoux's cohort

Meillasoux's critique of correlationism is a critique of Kant/phenomenology, not postmodernism, at all. Viz., that truth is "correlational." Meillasoux's cohort are friendly enough with postmodernists, even if they disagree. The Badiou/Meillasoux critique of postmodernism is for them believing _too much_ in absolute truth, viz., for them being platonists. I would recommend reading "The Clamor of Being" if you actually want to understand the matter.