4 ms·
Whether the ideographs are the "same" or not is definitely a can of worm, both academically and politically speaking. I am aware of the limits that the origina
by jack1243star 9y ago
Whether the ideographs are the "same" or not is definitely a can of worm, both academically and politically speaking.
I am aware of the limits that the original Unicode specs were subjected to, which adds to my grief on how things could have been. Now that it has taken over the world we have to deal with wrong characters displayed for many applications. (Even modern day iOS has problems displaying mixed language content in system text fields.)
I don't know much about the history of western languages, so I cannot comment on the issue, just that it feels unjustified that during development CJK languages got crammed together and messed up (no matter who did it). More and more emojis and other symbols just rub salt into the wound.
- mixmastamyk 9y agoI think it makes sense to "compress" the CJK characters to points where their appearance is the same, because there are on the order of one hundred thousand of them. For western alphabets that have thirty or so symbols, the need is not nearly so acute.
- jack1243star 9y agoAnd that is effectively what happened. Han unification has already done its damage and will continue to perform a lossy compression on all current and future CJK texts. Not that there is a way around...