3 ms·
No, because his "terrible-ness" has to do with priorities. A scientist's priority is usually to make a fast prototype or model of her theory. I see it at least
by kensai 9y ago
No, because his "terrible-ness" has to do with priorities. A scientist's priority is usually to make a fast prototype or model of her theory. I see it at least in my own field (biomedicine).
IF you need a real software developer for some extended work, you hire one. But to call scientists lousy programmers is like calling every driver on this earth lousy driver (in respect to Formula 1 drivers, for example).
- Chris2048 9y ago> A scientist's priority is.. Don't you mean a programmer? A fine scientist can still be a terrible programmer. > to call scientists lousy programmers is like calling every driver on this earth lousy driver Why? Most drivers on earth are fine drivers, terrible F1 drivers. Maybe most scientists are fine scientists, terrible programmers?
- hobarrera 9y agoMost drivers on earth are terrible drivers.