3 ms·
> This seems intuitively to be the case but I wonder what others think. I've not clicked through the article, but before I saw any comments here, I thought it
by SyneRyder 9y ago
> This seems intuitively to be the case but I wonder what others think.
I've not clicked through the article, but before I saw any comments here, I thought it was claiming that 16% of the HTML on the average site was devoted to Open Graph Stories markup, like / share buttons, and other embedded FB widgets.
(But that was already primed in my mind, as a couple of days I'd been examining the source of a website that had a ludicrously huge Head section, and it was filled with Facebook sharing markup.)
- mercer 9y agoInteresting. I would have never assumed as you did precisely because 16% of markup is a drop in the bucket compared to 16% of code (or CSS, even).