4 ms·
And instead of getting a lawyer to resolve this, he says he'll just 0-day exploits for it. Seems like a poor negotiation strategy to me.
by fred_is_fred 9y ago
And instead of getting a lawyer to resolve this, he says he'll just 0-day exploits for it. Seems like a poor negotiation strategy to me.
- 0xbear 9y agoHow does a lawyer resolve anything if there's no contract? And by extension, why should he refrain from publishing zero days if there's no contract? It's his software.
- King-Aaron 9y ago> why should he refrain from publishing zero days if there's no contract? I can probably think of 77-million potential reasons that he might not be able to / want to.
- 0xbear 9y agoNone of those reasons apply to him.
- knocte 9y agoIt's not about the contract, it's about the injury.
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- ben_w 9y agoHe may be able to argue that the statement is not a threat, merely a statement of fact. Saying: > my only way to get paid is by selling zero-day exploits for people who want to attack Aeternity. could seem like a Mafia goon saying "nice shop, shame if something happened to it" but it can also be read as "it's terrible that the employer has shafted the employee so hard there are no lawful ways for the employee to get paid".